Market insights and analysis

How dynamic, risk-managed investment solutions are performing in the current market environment

1st Quarter | 2024

Quarterly recap



Current market environment performance of dynamic, risk-managed investment solutions.

by Jerry Wagner

My wife and I have always been dog people. We’ve never owned cats, although we love to play with those of friends and relatives.

I’ve had a dog as a pet since I was about 6 years old. My first dog was called “Shiner.” You can guess why. Most of our family dogs (which number about a dozen by now) have been, like Shiner, mutts.

I remember we had two purebreds: a golden retriever (Snuffy) and a black Labrador (Brandy). They were great dogs. We raised both of our boys with them. They could not have been better companions or trusted friends; they were so gentle with the boys. We loved them both.

Unfortunately, Snuffy, like an awful lot of golden retrievers, died early of cancer. Brandy, as was the case for most of her breed, suffered from hip dysplasia and skin allergies. By contrast, all of our many mutts lived longer, healthier lives and basically died of old age.

It’s an age-old dispute: What’s better, a mutt or a purebred? The argument for mutts that I hear most often mirrors my experience: Mutts are much less susceptible to genetic disorders.

A study conducted at UC Davis that examined the vet records of more than 27,000 dogs spanning a 15-year period provided support for this argument. While it was found that purebreds had a greater incidence of 10 different genetic diseases, mutts only seemed predisposed to one.

As the Animal League of America states on its website, “When you adopt a Mutt, … you benefit from the combined traits of two or more breeds.”

But purebreds are not without their advantages. Chief among them is that they are more predictable. You know mostly what you’ve got when you get them. That’s why they are great as both show dogs and work dogs.

Does the mutt vs. purebred “argument” apply to investing?

In investing, I think of the commonly referenced asset-class indexes as purebreds—you know, the stock indexes such as the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite, bonds represented by the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index, and commodity indexes such as those from Goldman Sachs. They are predictable in a sense. They have long histories, and they basically behave the same way at different points of the economic cycle.

Like purebreds, individual asset classes are known for their good and bad traits. They, too, have their genetic defects, the principal one being that they are all volatile when owned individually. Each goes through its own periods of severe losses.

The most common way of dealing with this danger to your financial health is diversification. Each asset class has grown in value over the long run. The problem is that all of them go through these sudden slides in value. On the positive side, the downdrafts in each asset class tend to happen at different points in time from each other. One solution, then, is to invest in several asset classes. That’s an example of diversification.

The benefits (and limitations) of diversification

I tend to think of a diversified portfolio as a mixed-breed mutt who benefits “from the combined traits of two or more breeds.” The performance tends to be more robust and healthy. It is not as likely to fall victim to the defects of historical lineage as the purebred indexes.

A diversified portfolio is definitely not a “show dog.” While it smooths out the indexes’ rough spots, it can only produce average results (the average of returns of the investments used). It’s being adopted not for “Best in Show” possibilities but rather to deliver good results without dire threats to its financial health.

As a result, the diversified portfolio will never do as well as or better when the best-performing investment is doing its best—just as a mutt will never win the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show. But, just as the mutt provides great comfort when a problem surfaces at home, a diversified portfolio should outperform when a financial crisis occurs.

What are the characteristics of effective portfolio diversification?

To qualify as diversified, an investment portfolio should meet two conditions: First, it should hold multiple investments in different asset classes. Second, the investments should display their downside volatility at different points in time.

The first is relatively easy to accomplish. Just as there are more than 400 canine breeds, there are also hundreds of different asset classes in which you can invest. But which ones are best for a truly diversified portfolio?

That’s where the second criterion comes in. The investments chosen need to respond differently to diverse economic stimuli. When you track their daily or weekly movements, they should often zig when the others zag.

Finding these “uncorrelated” asset classes is the most difficult task, and the one upon which most investors stumble. Lured by historical returns—whether compiled over the last year, the last three years, or the last 20 years—investors tend to pick the top performers on a return basis when they select investments for their portfolios. Instead, they should look at how they perform in all types of markets individually—bull, bear, and sideways—and make sure that they include top performers in each type.

Similarly, they need to check the correlation statistic for each of the investments—not only against the S&P 500 but also against each other. Correlation measures the extent to which investments move in unison. To create a more robust portfolio, you want to avoid investments that are too similar in their movements.

Finally, when you check on the individual components of your portfolio, you should not recoil when you see a loss in a component or two. You wouldn’t do that with a Lab who came down with hip dysplasia. Rather, if the investment was put in to diversify the portfolio, congratulate yourself on being prepared for the next market cycle, which is not likely to be the same as the present one, which may be driving your other investments higher.

If all of your investments are going up, you are not truly diversified, and you may be in for a rude awakening.

Multi-strategy diversification vs. asset-class diversification—A better way?

What is multi-strategy diversification? It’s simply a portfolio diversified using dynamically risk-managed strategies rather than just asset classes.

You build these strategy portfolios similarly to how you create diversified asset-class portfolios, but instead of using portfolios, you use multiple strategies. These strategies are selected just like asset classes: You aim for uncorrelated strategies that have drawdowns at different times and whose daily and weekly returns zig when the others zag. Fortunately, compared to asset classes, there are many more strategies available that are uncorrelated with stocks.

We do not want strategies that all go up in value together. We want strategies that respond to different economic stimuli and appreciate and depreciate at different times.

While our firm has many different approaches for building a portfolio that is diversified with dynamically risk-managed strategies, here is a broad overview of one such approach: We would use a core strategy for at least 65% of the portfolio. Preferably this would be an actively managed, suitability-based portfolio. It would likely be one that would rotate to a collection of the strongest-ranked asset classes—holding the leaders and avoiding the laggards. This is designed to deliver two solutions. First, it seeks to keep the portfolio in step with the gains attainable from the stock market. Second, it allows us to make sure the portfolio is suitable for the level of risk at which our clients are comfortable. The balance of the portfolio would be used to add strategies uncorrelated to the stock market. Normally, these are actively managed bond, gold, and contrarian strategies that often do not perform as strongly during bull markets but mitigate losses in bear and sideways markets.


Diversified portfolios are like mixed-breed mutts—they provide the benefits of their many components without the higher risks associated with each individual breed. Similarly, I view a portfolio of strategies, as opposed to asset classes, as the best of the litter.

When researching this article, I learned that there are now dog shows for mutts. That means that our loveable mutts can finally get their recognition.

Comments are closed.